A Review of the Wildlife (Protection) Ammendment Act 2022

The Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972 has argubally been one of the most successful environmental legislations in world history. Recently, it underwent its most significant ammendments in 50 years. Here, the Wildlife (Protection) Ammendment Act 2022 will be reviewed.

A Bit of History about the Wildlife Protection Act

The Wildlife Protection Act was enacted in 1972 by Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. The objectives were:

  • Prohibition of hunting of wild animals.
  • Protection and management of wildlife areas and the animals, birds and plants in these areas.
  • Establishing new protected areas such as National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries.
  • Control of illegal wildlife trade

The Act, further paved the way for establishment of The National and State Board for Wildlife, Central Zoo Authority and National Tiger Conservation Authority, thereby strengthening the efforts for wildlife conservation in the country. WLPA is perhaps one of the most frequently amended laws of the country  being amended in 1982,1991, 1993, 2002 and 2006.

The Amendment Bill was passed in Lok Sabha in August 2022 and in Rajya Sabha in December 2022. This was done after two rounds of Consultation with the Parliamentary Standing Committee. The  total  number  of  amendments  proposed  in  the  Bill  are  50  including  eleven amendments  to  definitions. 

What has changed in the Wildlife (Protection) Ammendment Act 2022?

1) Changes in the preamble 

Instead of words “protection of wild animals, birds and plants”,  the words “conservation, protection and management of wildlife” were substituted in the preamble.

2) Reduction in number of schedules

The Bill reduces the number of schedules from six  to four.

Schedule I – Animal species that will enjoy the highest level of protection including those which are  critically endangered.

Schedule II Animal species that will be subject to a lesser degree of protection

Schedule III Protected Plant species

Schedule IV Specimens listed in the Appendices under CITES (scheduled specimens)

3) Implementation of CITES

Addition of Chapter VB provides regulation of  international wildlife trade as per provisions laid by CITES. The Central Government shall form a Managing Authority and a Scientific Authority to regulate import export of specimens of species.

4) Management of Wildlife Sanctuaries 

Under Section 33B, the Bill provides power to State governments to form an Advisory Committee consisting of Chief Wildlife Warden, members of legislature , wildlife NGOs and Panchayat Raj to manage wildlife sanctuaries. This Committee along with Gram Sabha shall formulate management plans for wildlife sanctuaries and  conservation reserves. This is the first step to transfer the decision making process towards being people centric.

5)  Criteria to declare animals  “Vermin

The  Principal  Act( Under Schedule V) and  the  amendment  both  use  the  term  ‘Vermin’  to  describe  species which  can  be  hunted  under  certain  conditions, to keep their numbers in check. eg Mice, rats, crows. 

6) References to Forests  Rights  Act,  2006 (FRA) 

According to Clause  13, 15 and 17 which  seek  to  amend  Section  33, 35 and 38 of  the principal  Act, the management of Sanctuaries should be done according to provisions  of  the  FRA act wherever applicable.

The Amendment Bill empowers the Gram Sabha and other local village institutions to collectively protect the forests, wild animals and biodiversity and take action against any activity posing threat to wildlife.

7) Permission to carry out subsistence fishing in and around Protected Areas

Under Section 29 and 33,The Bill allows low intensity, small-scale fishing in rivers and other water bodies in and around protected areas. This lifts the blanket ban which prohibits all types of fishing activity in and around Protected Areas, which had caused many people to lose their livelihood.

8) Invasive species 

The  amendment  to  Section  62A  of  the  principal  Act  recognizes  the  threat  to  ecosystems  from invasive  alien  species   and  also  provides  for  the  establishment  of  a  Scientific  Authority  (as per  CITES)  to  advise  on  matters  related  to  trade  of  such  species.

It also grants power to the Central Government to regulate or prohibit import, trade, possession or proliferation of such species.

9) Use of Protected Areas

Under the amendment of Section 29, the bill relaxes the norms on grazing of cattle and use of drinking water by the local communities living inside the  protected areas until they are settled elsewhere.

10) Trade of Live Elephants 

The amendment proposes  a new subsection (4) under Section 43:” Provided  that  the  transfer  or  transport  of  a  captive  elephant  for  a  religious  or any other  purpose  by a  person  having  a  valid  certificate  of  ownership  shall  be  subject to  such  terms  and  conditions  as  may be  prescribed  by the  Central  Government.” This amendment can lead to legalization of elephant trade in India. This is potentially problematic given the horrific plight of India’s captive elephants.

11) Ownership of captive animals and trophies

Under section 42A, any person possessing a captive animal or a trophy can voluntarily surrender it to the government without expecting any compensation for the same. Such live animals will be taken under care of rescue centers if they are not suitable to be released in the wild.

12) Prohibition of renewal of license of firearms.

Under amendment of section 34, No  renewal of any license under  the Arms Act,  1959, shall  be granted  to any person  residing  within  ten  kilometers of  a  sanctuary except  under  the  intimation  to the Chief WildLife Warden  or  the  authorized officer.”.

13) Enhanced penalties: 

The Bill also enhances the penalties prescribed for violation of provisions of the Act. For ‘General violations’, the maximum fine has been increased from Rs 25,000 to Rs. 1 lakh. In the case of Specially protected animals, the minimum fine of Rs. 10,000 has been enhanced to Rs. 25,000.

14) Change in definition of ‘zoos’

Zoos will hereby serve as the areas for ex-situ conservation, rescue centers and breeding centers in addition to their purpose being that of exhibition of animals.

Does the Amendment Bill justify the current challenges  to Wildlife Conservation?

No, there are many loopholes in the current amendment. Certain clauses and sections which were amended are not clearly defining the purpose for the amendment. Certain important topics like human-wildlife conflict, exploitation of animals on religious grounds, the illegal wildlife trade and conservation of endangered species are ignored in the Amendment Bill.

Certain topics such as conservation of marine biodiversity are not covered in this Bill.

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Forest, Wildlife and Climate Change received around 60 memoranda citing  objections and suggestions from well known wildlife NGO’s, wildlife experts, researchers as well as citizens of India on the proposed draft of the amendment bill in 2021. Few members of legislation also submitted their suggestions on the bill to the committee.

Based on these objections and suggestions, the Parliamentary Committee had submitted its recommendations to the Ministry of Forest, Wildlife and Climate Change. However, although the public comments drew  attention to several lacunae in the draft, it cannot be said that those suggestions were actually implemented in the final bill.

Critisicm of the Wildlife (Protection) Ammendment Act 2022

Should the CITES be given so much importance?

The  most  important  reason  for  introducing  the  Bill, being the   need  to  provide  legislative  backing  to commitments  made  by  India  over  the  past  many  years  to  the  CITES. 

The new Schedule IV added in the WLPA enlists all the species found in CITES appendices I, II and III and regulates their trade as prescribed via chapter VB. Under this chapter, any person having a registration certificate can legally posses, transfer and carry out captive breeding of Schedule IV species.

According to a recommendation suggested by Mr. Debi Goenka of Conservation Action Trust,  the  Chapter  on  CITES  should  be  removed  from  the  WLPA  and  enacted  as  a  separate  Act. 

We  are  suggesting this  because  whilst  the  WLPA  is  a  restrictive/prohibitory  Act,  the  CITES  chapter  enables  the  trade  and  breeding  of  exotic  wildlife. There  is  a  need  to  add  a  separate  clause  to  the  Act  saying  that  the  provisions  of  the  CITES  chapter  would  not  apply  to any  species  of  wildlife  that  is  found  naturally  in  India. 

The Parliamentary Committee also suggested introducing amendments  in  the  relevant  Sections  of  the  principal  Act  without  necessarily  having  an elaborate  Chapter  VB   as  proposed  in  the  Bill.  

Is elephant trade being legalized?

An unexpected exemption came in the form of an amendment under Section 43, which deals with trade of ‘live’ elephants.

While the Principal Act prohibited any form of commercial sale of wild animal, its parts or trophies, the amendment sought exemption to carry out trade and transport of live elephants for religious use after permission from Central and State governments. 

Elephants being Schedule I species,under the principal act, elephants can only be owned when inherited. This major loophole can not only lead to smuggling of captive elephants, but also illegal capture of wild elephants.

Almost all Wildlife NGO’s have raised their concern over this issue and even have suggested scrapping this amendment altogether.

As rightfully put forth by Varun Goswami of Conservation Initiatives “this clause is prone to abuse and can severely impact elephant populations by legitimizing live trade of elephants, reviving a now-dying illegal trade in wild-caught elephants, and thus negating years of successful conservation efforts on this important and charismatic species”

According to PETA, while there are 2,675 captive elephants in India, only 1,251 ownership certificates have been issued by different states.

Laxity in declaring Invasive species 

The bill declares any species not native to India as being invasive. However IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) defines any problematic species, introduced  outside its  natural past or present distribution as invasive. The focus should be the alien nature of the species to the ecosystem and the problem it creates for those growing within the ecosystem.

What is considered vermin?

The term Vermin sounds derogatory according to many experts. Also the criteria for declaring any species as ‘vermin’  has not been defined. Any animal listed in schedule II, if declared a vermin can lose its protection and be hunted or culled.Mr. Praveen Bhargav of Wildlife First had recommended including feral dogs as ‘vermin’ owing to an increase in threats to wild herbivores.

What about marine wildlife?

India has a coastline of 7000 km and a varied range of marine biodiversity.  The island groups are fragile ecosystems harboring many endemic species.

All  marine resources  are  protected  under  the  Coastal  Regulation  Zone  (CRZ)  of  1991 which extends its protection to the coral reefs aiso. However not all coral reefs are protected under this Act.Tourism industry, construction, mining and quarrying activities pose threat to not only the coral reefs but the entire marine ecosystem. Certain CITES listed marine species are consumed as food in India and their trade may soon be rendered illegal.

Schedules remain ambigious

One of the frequent criticisms received from experts is lack of taxonomical accuracy while enrolling the species in their respective schedules. Many endangered species are not listed in Schedules I and II and some are omitted completely. 

Several  migratory  birds  which  are  listed  in  CITES  appendices  but  not  specified currently  in  Schedule  I -IV  in  the  Principal  Act,  are  winter  visitors  to  India. These species are hunted widely by the local gangs, however neither these birds are notified, nor are they referred to in the Amendment bill.

According to NGO’s ‘ATREE’ and ‘Biodiversity Collaborative’, “there should be an alignment of schedules with the IUCN Red list.

Less power to State Wildlife Board

The Bill  has amended Section 6  which  will allow the  State Boards  of Wildlife (SBWL) to establish a Standing Committee for exercising  powers thereby reducing the State’s hold over its wildlife.

Illegal trade between India and China

The illicit wildlife trade includes trafficking in animal parts such as ivory  rhino  horns,  tiger  bones  and  genitals,  leopard  pelts  and  paws,  and  bear  paws and shark fins,  for  use  in  traditional  African  and  Asian  medicines. Certain parts are also traded for making clothing, rugs and wall hangings.

CITES Appendices  provide  an  exhaustive  taxonomical  list  of  species  that  cannot  be traded  internationally.  However, the WLPA and its amendment have failed to impose prohibition for trade  in these  species  locally.

Commercial wildlife trade and captive breeding is legal in China which increases chances of poaching and cross border illegal trade in India. But this issue is not covered adequately under the Act.

Can zoos aid in conservation?

Wildlife experts have raised concern over the importance given to zoos and also  questioned the mere existence of such areas which are used to display animals for recreation purposes.

Are the penalties suffecient?

The Bill gives a vague description about the penalties to be applied if the species in Schedule I and II are harmed or killed. Also it does  not provide any explanation regarding accidental deaths (eg. road kills, bycatch in fishing). 

This will allow activities such as mining, deforestation and  polluting rivers with industrial effluents to be carried out rampantly.

Conclusion 

It has been 50 years ever since the Wildlife Protection Act came into existence, signifying an end to rampant poaching, decimating illegal wildlife trade and providing protection to abundant wildlife of the country. Did it really happen? 

The 2022 Amendment Bill tries to upgrade the Act by introducing newer strategies, better management plans and science based conservation. However it falls short to address the new age conservation challenges

Written by: Dr. Nupur Sawant

Help us Help Them! Think Wildlife Foundation is a non profit organization with various conservation initiatives. Our most prominent campaign is our Caring for Pari intiative. Pari is a rehabilitated elephant at the Wildlife SoS Hospital. 25% of the profits from our store are donated to the elephant hospital for Pari. Other than buying our wonderful merchandise, you could donate directly to our Caring For Pari fundraiser.

Think Wildlife Foundation